Lost Dutchman Goldmine

one of the relatively few times ive agreed with peter......

it isnt a bandwagon....merely an observation...research of its own into anything isnt of itself a waste of time,the waste ,if indeed it is waste,depends on the expectations you have from that research.fun, enjoyment can be derived from looking into any historical subject.but its foolish to think ...

bill,
that was short and sweet bill-i agree with you 100%,and larry webbs correct also....being an "expert" (so called) on the various histories,tales etc will in reality get you nowhere, partly because in my opinion it never existed anyhow, but also cos so many folks have got on the jacob waltz ...

i believe this present thread has been orchestrated,tis a pity cos it was in danger of becoming interesting before the aggro began. i also believe its unfair to blame 1 member alone for the "troubles".this next comment isnt a "dig" at anyone, but a member has stated that everyone else gets along ...

S.C

thank you for your input,its not always easy to speak out...its appreciated...ive got enough of my own "wacky" ideas without being burdened with anybody elses (that was meant as a joke.....well...partly)

Were the guardhouses(if they existed) ever satisfactorily explained?as i recall wasnt sidney brinkerhoff called in to examine magills "find",even did a series of radio or tv broadcasts on the progress of the group if i recall correctly.,and as far as i remember no definitive conclusion was reached ...

well santos....wat u expect..?.sounds par for the course

cu miner,
im impressed by your attitude, how about trying a small measure of courtesy? anyway enough of such frivolity....regarding hrdlicka...this book might be of some help...Reckoning with the dead:the larsen bay repatriation and the smithsonian institution...tamara l bray (editor)..thomas w ...

cu miner,
i didnt ask you ,or demand that you did anything.you were the one who said my post was abrasive. but nonetheless i will gracefully accept your no doubt heartfelt apology.
nowhere did i state that holmes was hysterically inane, i stated that holmes assertion that he recognised the skull as ...

......and of course the official, and i stress the word OFFICIAL verdict was ,and still is death by natural causes.....that in itself is a piece of official evidence that cant easily be ignored.not to say that i believe that everything "official" is 100%truthful ,but you cant just wave it away as ...

cu miner,
my post was not in any way abrasive or abusive, nor meant to be,so there is no need for me to apologise for it.maybe you might feel there is reason for you to.
joe,no surprise you disagreed with me,but the spirit in which uyou disagreed was refreshing....a welcome change...lets hope ...

redison,
what kind of hypocrisy is that?

perhaps more to the point,was it ruths skull? remember halseth first identified it as an indian skull, possibly of a far greater age than ruths would have been.....the so called identification by holmes, in which he stated he recognised it as being ruths due to fact hed met ruth before borders on ...

i dont believe this!......sillier and sillier said alice..... has this forum gone f ...ingmad? aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

jan,
as far as crap goes, you at present are the most obvious example on this forum at the moment.....not to say there arent 10r 2 two others.....you , your aliases and "partners in crime " are the shit that infest this forum right now.as for being "uninvited" i take that as a compliment coming ...

jan,/peter
was the intro which told everyone how much you despised and hated joe really necessary? you dont need to add your weight to the bandwagon, it must allready be in danger of capsizing dont you think?

WELL Ifor 1 am glad a few members have spoken out,im aware that answering back can fan the flames, but turning your back can encourage the bully also.This a forum most of us enjoy,and it would be a shame to see it disintegrate...i sincerely hope it doesnt.while its true we are only physically ...

well, roger, i presume you are speaking about the present "battle" taking place here on this forum right now.im not disagreeing with the sentiments of the" tale " youve posted. but why the need to speak cryptically?the issue of who is the aggressior here is pretty clear cut.its gone beyond a case of ...

bill,
pay them no heed....i doubt if peter, wyatt ,the cool club, ilove jr,etc etc,combined have the intelligence of a chocolate mouse.let them play,it would appear they got very little else in their lives....it must be the "legendary treasure hunter" syndrome wot does it

Im not even going to waste energy any more denying these silly claims thatI,bill and joe are one and the same.If the fools wanna believe....then let them...the fools will ALWAYS believe!
This latest in a long series of attacks on 1 individual is typical of the actions of the "forum clique". whether ...

ldm,
my impression at the time, and probabley still is ,is that conatsers tale was more likely than not just a "filler". there a great deal about the kochera story that can ring true...theres an equal amount that doesnt.the story has been clouded somewhat,but not i feel by people with ulterior or ...

just wondered would kocheras company be the group conatser spoke of in her book"the sterling legend" ?

tgh, maybe you could begin the purification process by retracting your blatant lie that myself and joe are the self same entity, and if you cant or wont ,then maybe you could inform the forum the reasons why you "KNOW "that we are. your double edged,triple sided supposed so called attempts at ...

wyatt.........shut up!

joe,
im glad u didnt allow yourself to be driven off the forum.
sincerely