Critter,
At any given time an existing "worked out" gold mine could become a producer. Assuming the ore from the Dutchman was any of the types that have been described by various people, something close to those descriptions could be part of that "new" vein.
Assume that a "worked out" mine, outside the Wilderness Area, was used as a "source" for Dutchman ore,
or any any other valuable mineral, from inside the Superstitions. What government agency would step in and
require testing to determine that the ore, or in this case practically pure gold, came from that mine?
Two things required for an
effective caliche barrier to opening the LDM, would be calcium carbonate (lime) and water. While anything is possible, that seems unlikely in this case.
"In that case, then the mine itself would be full of dirt....".
I have not read any account where the mine would be "full of dirt".
"And since "no miner" will inevitably find it, they will undoubtedly be unprepared to undertake the required work."
I believe that, assuming Waltz made that statement, he meant that his mine did not have any of the "signs" that a miner would look for. A miner would have just as good a chance (or better) of finding the mine by accident as anyone.
Many people believe they have all the answers when it comes to what would happen if someone should find the LDM. For those who know the right people, it's a well known fact/secret that such a mine was found in the Superstitions and worked out in the 1990s.
"There really is not an easy solution to the problem. It certainly isn't as cut and dry as dig or don't dig, write or don't write, black or white, like many seem to think."
It seems to me, that the above statement should be written as an opinion and not presented as a statement of "fact". Replacing "certainly isn't" with
may not be would have left you with some wriggle room. Any "scientist" worth his salt would have worded it to allow wriggle room.
Much of my post is personal opinion. Some is fact. Please do not consider this a personal attack on you. It is simply opposing opinions (for the most part) to the conclusions you have presented.
Joe Ribaudo