klondike wrote:Hello Roy,
As I have mentioned before most of the questions you have asked have been answered time and time again over the last 10 years. Seems the mention of the ship being sunk in the Salt River was made originally over 5 years ago. Specifics were provided and why go over it again. Particularly when the responses tend to be negative and become personal very quickly.
Well I must have missed that earlier reference, and the tendency for personal attacks is not just a one way street here. But you have surprised me:
<Klondike also wrote>
The specific shipwreck I mentioned occurred in the end times of the people and is mentioned in the library. There is a specific drawing of the event. From what we can tell it was a cargo vessel. Other vessels were sunk in the area over the ages. Imagine finding most of those would be pretty difficult though.
OK - thank you! A cargo vessel, I take it then that you have not seen the actual ship, it remains totally buried? I guess the rest of the questions about the ship itself could not be answered then. Were you able to determine if the cargo vessel was built here (in America) or had traveled here?
<Klondike also wrote>
Keep in mind the colony of Calalus was a specific adventure for a specific reason. That is the reference to the new world made in the Critias and the specific road map to the Superstitions therein. This is not world history. At least it did not start out that way. The library of Oz. Just a local library in a out of the way place. It did survive though and because of this it became something remarkable. I remember a long time ago we made the reference to Alaska. That Alaska, while important to the United States, is not central to its being. Pretty much the same was true for the ancients. The Southwest a nice place to visit but not a place to live. The ancients had quite a gig.
Our people discovered it and the rest became history.
To understand that history you have to start with the Tucson Artifacts and go outward. Study the symbology, study the drawings, put together the trails that are shown and go from there.
When we posted the relationship between the Tucson Artifacts and the library of Oz and the reference on the artifacts to that library I thought we had perhaps said too much not to little. It is one thing to prove something it is another thing to figure it out. That is where your work must be done.
There is more proof to the existence of the library than really any other supposed undocumented event in the history of the America`s. Whether you figure it out is another matter.
Lets take it a byte at a time, and focus on the ship for now? I do not live in Arizona and it is over 1000 miles drive to get there, and I do try to get there every year, but my limited time there is entirely spoken for. I don't have time to go hiking in the Superstitions to try to follow a trail that many others have already, just to see some landmarks. But I am interested in this shipwreck.
<Klondike also wrote>
Perhaps I can do something that might help you if you are interested in all of this. Simply pm me here. I maybe able to answer certain things in a pm that are really not answerable in a public forum. Building trust is important.
Certainly, will send that PM very shortly. However we seem to have very different views on history, for I feel it needs to be made known to the public, not hidden away for any special group. So
if there is some information that you do NOT wish to ever be public, don't tell me. I do not believe in keeping our history a secret or only for a select few. However I do understand that sometimes a site
has to be protected from the public, like a rock inscription or pictogram, which if made public would then be a target for vandals, in which case - that type of information I will
not make public without getting
express written permission beforehand. I have some info like that already, including several bone arrow points with undeniable Punic writing on them, which unfortunately I can not use for publication because the discoverer does not want even the state where they were found to be made public. Such information is only partially helpful in making the case for ancient visitors to America, for when the provenance is being withheld, the skeptics then have an argument against the validity of such artifacts. (Or inscriptions, etc). Anyway certainly, I will get a PM sent shortly but let me finish this.
<Klondike also wrote.
And be assured it is not because you scream and carry on. Really I think it is something else. Something tells me you have discovered something apart from all of this that proves Calalus existed. Either that or you have become aware of a discovery in the Superstitions that points to Oz. A discovery well it does not matter.
Keep in mind though I am retired from all of this and my interest in the Superstitions is simply carrying for a special place in Roger`s Canyon and the underground workings of Rhoda. The library of Oz is safe.
Klondike
I don't know why you keep getting the impression that I am "screaming" or having "hissy fits" when I could hardly be more calm and cool, and be awake. I put things in bold and LARGE type simply
to draw your attention to them. Sometimes things get overlooked, and I have missed my share of points in various discussions over the years. I have an enduring interest in any and all evidence of pre-Columbian contacts with the Old World, or I would not have bothered you for so long. I will tell you this, if I were really upset and angry, there would not be any need to guess at it, and I would not spend any further time talking to the person. I have no hesitation to make it clear if I am angry, nor reason to be oblique about it.
Let me get that PM sent off, have to sign off here shortly (I do have actual physical work to do while it is daylight) but wanted to catch up. Thank you again for the info on the ship. I take it then your impression was that the ship was not "coming to" Calalus but intending to sail away, perhaps taking passengers to safety? I am guessing there but would like to hear your views on it, thank you in advance on that part. Oh and before I forget, the drawing, could you determine if the ship had more than one mast, and was it rigged with square sail or lateen? Sometimes it is hard to tell from a drawing of course, your impression or even a guess will do for that question.
For our readers whom do not post;
- the reason I am so interested in the details on the ship, are to determine (if possible) what type of ship, the size, perhaps the origin port or at least by finding as close a match to the type of ship we may find some affinity to say, for example, Byzantine sailing vessels which would be the correct type to fit with the story of Calalus, but if Arab, that would not necessarily be wrong, or if some anachronistic type, then we have more problems. Also, a ship capable of sailing up a river, is not going to be the large, ocean-going type, more likely it would be an open-deck, narrow vessel, shallow draft so as to be able to navigate the shallows and rapids of a river. Hence the multiple questions about this ship wreck reported.
Oroblanco