BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Anything goes. Politics, religion and your neighbors spouse. No censors, no dictators. Any and all opinions welcome.
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

[REPUBLICANS, CONSERVATIVES, LIBERTARIANS AND...DEMOCRATS MUST REMAIN INCALCITRANT AND STAND FAST AGAINST THE OBAMA PROGRESSIVES WHO WILL DESTROY OUR COUNTRY...ON PURPOSE!!! BECAUSE NO ONE CAN BE THAT STUPID]

President Obama is following the model of Argentina.......to the letter!

Read the history of Argentina from the early 20th. Century to the present. It all started with the slogan........"Fundamental Change".

[At the beginning of the 20th. Century Argentina was one of the richest countries in the world."

"In 1916, Argentina elected a new president. Hipolito Irgoyen had formed a party called "The Radicals" under the banner of "Fundamental Change".]

The blueprint for the destruction of America had been created. President Obama is following that blueprint right now. It's time for America to become informed of this president's agenda.

Joe Ribaudo
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... 35422.html


[This is nothing new! Don't stop protesting!!


This explains why Washington is always in a hurry while they have the power.


This is why it is critical that we, as Americans, start paying close attention to the "stuff" coming out of Washington .
What Harry Reid hid deep in the Health Care Bill is unbelievable!




Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the maxim that darkness hates the light.
Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation!
Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: ". it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection."
In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!!
Note that the subsection at issue here concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to "reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending."
That is precisely the kind of open-ended grant of regulatory power that effectively establishes the IMAB as the ultimate arbiter of the cost, quality and quantity of health care to be made available to the American people. And Reid wants the decisions of this group of unelected federal bureaucrats to be untouchable for all time.
No wonder the majority leader tossed aside assurances that senators and the public would have at least 72 hours to study the text of the final Senate version of Obamacare before the critical vote on cloture. And no wonder Reid was so desperate to rush his amendment through the Senate, even scheduling the key tally on it at 1 a.m., while America slept.
True to form, Reid wanted to keep his Section 3403 poison pill secret for as long as possible, just as he negotiated his bribes for the votes of Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bernie Sanders of Vermont behind closed doors.
The final Orwellian touch in this subversion of democratic procedure is found in the ruling of the Reid-controlled Senate Parliamentarian that the anti-repeal provision is not a change in Senate rules, but rather of Senate "procedures." Why is that significant?
Because for 200 years, changes in the Senate's standing rules have required approval by two-thirds of those voting, or 67 votes rather than the 60 Reid's amendment received.
Reid has flouted two centuries of standing Senate rules to pass a measure in the dead of night that no senator has read, and part of which can never be changed. If this is not tyranny, then what is?


DON'T SIT BY AND LET THIS HAPPEN IN THE DARK!!! FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR LIST! It is Especially important, that you email or call you Senators NOW!!


Think of your Grandkids.]
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.” -- Author Unknown
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

This is an outrage. Not only will these illegal aliens receive all in this report, they will also be eligible once given citizenship for Medicaid. Since the estimate is 15-20 million how much of a budget buster is this going to be. We have to stop this in its tracks or we are going to end up a third world country.







REMEMBER all this in November when you vote, if you still get to vote by then!!!




CNN News, not Fox -- You won't believe this!!



Has congress gone nuts?

And I thought Obama was done inflicting indignities to the American people! Please pass this to as many Americans as you can.

I KNEW this was going to happen. (That way Obama wasn't lying when he said illegals would not be able to get medical coverage under his ObamaCare plan. His simple fix is to make them all legal first.)

EVERYONE--PLEASE TAKE TIME TO LISTEN TO THIS--IT TELLS ABOUT THE BILL GOING THRU CONGRESS RIGHT NOW REGARDING IMMIGRATION.



EVEN CNN IS UPSET ABOUT THIS!!!!!!!!!!

Pass this on after you watch it..




NOTICE THAT THIS IS FROM CNN, NOT FOX!!!




This from CNN news: http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/17260182/16 ... c-vi26.wmv







This 2-minute video should be mandatory viewing for every US citizen. If you have never passed anything on before, pass this on! Every American should be outraged!
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

The above post shows one of the dirty little tricks that President Obama is using to destroy our country. The object of his agenda is to turn us into a third world country and then rebuild a socialist utopia.

He believes he can avoid the pitfalls that has caused every other country that has tried this system to fail. They are so much smarter than the people they are attempting to subjugate. It's a perfect example of those who refuse to learn from history.

The real question here is: What have you learned from history........including President Obama's history?

15-20 million new voters voting to turn us into the country they fled. Got the picture yet?

Joe Ribaudo
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

Thanks, Beerfart, for presenting another paranoid delusion from the crazies on the right. I don't know about anyone else, but I find that spam emails are an excellent source of information...NOT! By the way, I see you sure are going through those painkillers at a rapid pace these days. And it's really impressive the way you complain about government handouts when you are the only one of the two of us to ever accept one and you do so on a regular basis, don't you? You're a hypocrite, a liar, and a paranoid delusional, but I've already proven that over and over again. Have fun in that delusional world of yours, mine is looking at the Blueprint for Reconstruction after the Destruction the Bush Administration wreaked upon the world, but you aren't smart enough to realise the truth. Besides, the fact that you are displeased only makes me even more pleased.

So...

Fuck off, Joe!
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

Hello Critter,

Glad to see you haven't killed yourself yet.

You think I'm delusional? That's really funny for someone who describes his location as: "Second star on the right and straight on till morning". That's a typical problem for burned out pot-heads. It's known as the Peter Pan Syndrome.

There are times when I take pain-killers, but I never use them for more than a few days. I just turned 65, so I am on Medicare now, but I have been paying for that insurance all of my life. In addition to that, I have always paid my own way......plus some.

No one here really cares what you pot-heads think or say. On the other hand, I did pay attention that you shared your habit with your son. What a life.....

Thanks for your mindless comment. It makes me smile to know I have ruffled your feathers enough to have you come out of your stupor long enough to type a reply. My guess is that it's really Brad posting on your ID. 8O What's going on here has nothing to do with you......right? :lol:

Joe Ribaudo
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

"My guess is that it's really Brad posting on your ID."

Beerfart,

Yep,you are still delusional, and a hypocrite and a liar. You haven't changed a bit. Go wave around some teabags, mate, that's about all you're good at.

So...

Fuck off, Joe!
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

"I just turned 65, so I am on Medicare now"

It's good to know you're a fan of "Socialist Medicine".

Hypocrite! 8O 8O
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

By the way "second star on the right and straight on till morning" is a phrase often used to describe where I live...New Zealand, but you'd have to be intelligent and somewhat worldly to know that and you aren't either of those things. You actually do know where I am, I've told you, Brad has told you, and I even let you peek at my IP address, so if you're still confused, then it's YOU, mate, not me, with the serious lack of reality. Maybe you should lay off the hillbilly heroin for a while and try a non-toxic, non-addictive analgesic. It would do you some good.

So...

Fuck off, Joe!
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

By the way, everyone, Joe also collects Social Security, which is welfare. So he's got his snout well into the trough for government handouts. Joe is a hypocrite and a liar and guaranteed if someone mentions cuts to his precious government checks, he'd be the first in line to lodge a complaint. I'm not terribly bothered by his mindless insults, that's all he has to defend himself with, since the facts don't land on his side. I actually feel sorry for him. He's a drug addict who is totally confused by reality. He needs serious help.
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

critter,

You really do have wide sweeping knowledge about me. It's all wrong, but wide sweeping. 8O

I don't collect any checks from social security. Make too much money. All of your comments about me are products of a burned out pothead.

In time I will collect S.S. payments. Worked all of my life, even now, and paid my share of the money the Congress ended up stealing from the people. They liked to use it to create programs for drug addicts, like yourself, hoping they could keep them from breaking into their homes and killing everyone for enough money for their next fix.

Lucky for us you live where you do. We have more than enough America haters living here, and don't need any more trash.

I am still laughing about the Ribaudo you found here.......who wasn't me, and threatened to post his tax returns. What a dolt. You always manage to rate your intelligence far above what you have shown here. I figure you must always be loaded when you hit your keyboard.

It's true that I do insult you on a regular basis, but nothing more than what you so richly deserve. Unlike your own weak efforts, I do it with a little class. You are barely able to lift your head up out of the cesspool of what you call your life, long enough to vomit out your most eloquent thoughts.

Actually, I don't know why I do it, but it just seems like something that needs to be done. No one else really wants to get your muck splashed on them, but I have always seemed to be able to rise above the gutter addicts. Try as you might, you are never able to get your face out of the mud.

How many kids, other than your own, have you turned into potheads? Is that the limit for you, or do you share needles as well?

Everything I have written here is the truth. This is where you come back and lie your ass off about me. :lol:

Joe Ribaudo
JIM HAMRICK
Part Timer
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:46 am
Location: phoenix
Contact:

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by JIM HAMRICK »

Mr. Rabaudo:

Welcome to your golden years. You will experence many wonderous things (not). I hope your body is strong enough to cope with them.

For those of you seem to think that because us old ones who take our social security checks and medicare means that we approve of socialism, this is not true. from my early memories I can not remember not working, school was looked forward to becuse it was a break from my chores. Social security was looked on as a contract between the goverment and the worker and I held up my end of the agreement. As for medicare, it costs my retirement about $900+/- a month to cover my wife and me for what medicare does not pay for, of this $900 I pay app. $600 a month. Nothing comes free and for my entire life I have expected to pay my part.

For you younger ones who are full vim and vigor I wish you well but I fear that your old age will not be happy nor secure. Your goverment as it is now will make sure of this while telling you how good you have it.

About 30 years ago I could tell that something was not right in the U.S.A. I could
see it but could not understand why. Today the festering sore is about to erupt and what comes out I fear very much. You must understand that we are now in the overthrow of our constituion and headed into a faciest / socialist goverment. What I fear is a goverment crackdown denying the citizens the rights guaranted by the constution. If this happens then a civil war is possible within the next two years and this is one thing that we do not want.

jim hamrick
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

That's all very interesting, but unfortunately for you guys none of it does anything to change the fact that you are paranoid delusional hypocrites. So until you guys can actually articulate a coherent counterpoint, then I will take my victory and leave you to it.

But in the meantime...

Fuck off, Joe!
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

critter or Brad,

"....then I will take my victory and leave you to it."

Translation.....Run away......run away......squeak.....squeak.

Once again you have proven yourself to be an idiot. Man would have to be an idiot to insult someone like Jim Hamrick. :roll:

Joe Ribaudo
JIM HAMRICK
Part Timer
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:46 am
Location: phoenix
Contact:

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by JIM HAMRICK »

critter:

I do not understand why you would think that I am a hypocrit because I entered into an agrement with another entity, the federal goverment, and I lived up to my part of the agreement and expect the other entity to live up to theirs.

As to me being delusional, I can only say that I hope you are right. that would be right-on with me. I do fear that the ephemeral mirage that you see is more close to what it will be and that would be a sad ending to such a noble country as ours.

Best of luck to you and I do hope that the future that I see does not come into being.

jim hamrick
don
Part Timer
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by don »

And I thought Britain was going down the drain.....At this rate Jim any civil war in america will be fought with handbags and mascara brushes.......unbelievable! :roll:




QUOTE FROM NEWS PAGE



A school in New Jersey has come under fire after instructing male students as young as eight-years-old to arrive at school in female clothes for a cross-dressing fashion show.

The scdress their sons up in outfits including cheerleading uniforms and poodle skirts. The move was designed to mark Women's History Month, but caused such outrage that the fashion show was eventually cancelled.

Sky News reports that one mother, Janine Giandomenico, claimed that her son cried "Mommy, please don't make me do this" when given the letter. The fashion show was also due to be videotaped.

The pack, which was sent to parents, informed them that all students must participate. However, it did say that the boys didn't have to wear a dress or skirt, as "there are many time periods where women wore jeans, pants and trousers"

Suggestions were made for fashion moments from the 1950, 1960s and 1970s, and the children were expected to have expressed a certain time period through their outfit.

To replace the fashion show, children have now been asked to draw a picture of a person from that era. The headteacher, Beth Narcia, has also apologised to parents for "any confusion or frustration" they may have experienced.

Source: Sky News


AND THE COMMENTS


Comments (21)
PermalinkEmail this
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)

1Jerome Davis 4-16-2010 @ 4:08PM
This is child abuse by the PC brigade. There is nothing well meaning or correct about it and the poiltics are those of the self-obsessed gender obsessed nutcases of the cursed disease called post modern feminism.

Is there an equivalent month where the world is ordered to obsess about menand who the hell would want to? This is child abuse and as it is of a sexual nature, it is psychological castration. Or PC for short.

Reply

2Amy 4-16-2010 @ 5:13PM
Jerome, I agree with you. Forcing children to dress up in clothing that makes them feel stupid is totally wrong. PC at its worst. There are other ways of teaching children about fashion in history. Get a grip anyone who thinks otherwise.



3Finolla 4-16-2010 @ 4:18PM
What a load of codswallop Jerome, we had boys in my days dressed as girls in plays and they enjoyed it. What about girls who play Principal Boys in pantomines - just because someone wants them to put on female clothes does not turn them into transexuals and child abuse well I never - get a life Jerome get out and about a bit more. I used to love dressing up as Charlie Chaplin when I was younger, never did me any harm I still wear dresses and skirts lol.

Reply

4Ray 4-16-2010 @ 5:57PM
I think the key difference here is that you CHOSE to dress up. Enforced feminisation of young boys is clearly wrong and you can only fail to see it if you really, really try.



5R Takada 4-16-2010 @ 5:22PM
I don't see what the fuss is about. I can see that some boys would rather drop dead than wear a skirt or a dress, and so that can easily be replaced with jeans, pants or trousers, but there was once a time when women were forced to dress only in womens' cloting, and when women dressing as men was at the very least frowned upon, and at the most extreme a criminal offence. The least that the teachers can do is show the boys was it is like, to create beter empathy and understanding.
Yes, this is Political Correctness at work, and it was only going to be for a day anyways. That wouldn't be enough to give the boys the idea that wearing girls clothing is good, if that's what their fathers and mothers are thinks. Besides, they could've gotten extra cedit points for it.

This obssession over gender socialisation needs to stop, because it shouldn't matter if a boy is wearing girl's cothing or vice versa. If you like it and feel good in it, no matter who's wearing it, it shouldn't be an issue.

Reply

6sonny 4-16-2010 @ 6:17PM
What a load of RUBBISH your comment is.

Leave the poor kids alone, no boy wants to be forced to wear girls clothes. If they want to then thats ok. But no way should anyone be made to wear things they don't want to.



7Neil 4-16-2010 @ 4:32PM
Wow, is this really international news? Homophobic ignorant rednecks is all this story is really about, people that actually think that being asked to do things like that affects you in any way. laughable. The kids obviously shouldn't be forced to do something they don't want to do, but that is really the limit of this story. The teachers obviously just saw it as a bit of fun to get the kids imaginations involved, but got the response you expect from the ignorant.

Reply

8Ann 4-16-2010 @ 4:44PM
How silly. Why didn't they just make it voluntary? And just a short thing, with them bringing their usual clothes to change into. A lot of boys would have enjoyed it and really got into th spirit of things. My son dressed as a female character for World Book Day and loved every minute! Incidentally, if they ever hold a Roman day what will the boys wear then?

Reply

9Donna 4-16-2010 @ 4:56PM
This sounds like a really cool idea. The boys could have worn jeans etc. if they'd wanted to, so why the big fuss? People are so narrow-minded and bigoted!

Reply

10Zac Lawrence 4-16-2010 @ 5:19PM

You said 'The boys could have worn jeans etc. if they'd wanted to, so why the big fuss? '.
The big fuss is because they DIDN'T want to and felt that they were being bullied into it.



11ann 4-16-2010 @ 5:07PM
My god -only in america springs to mind,but on reflection i doubt it ,but come on ,its a bit of fun ,and as some one has already said ,if they took their clothes to change into ? I used to prefer wearing my dads trousers and mens shirts -still do ,but im no gender bender!! Look at the film white chicks,hot chicks ,tootsie ,victor /victoria, hairspray,all depicted women ,but did they transgress? NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

12Zac Lawrence 4-16-2010 @ 5:18PM
Jerome you are spot on. This is typical of the modern PC age of role reversal and the PC brigade are at it in all walks of live. 'Brainwash the youngsters into thinking that this sort of thing is normal! Make them do it! Bully them! Get them young! Feminise men! After all who needs men?' The world should be run by women - there wouldn't be any wars would there?' - this fatuous thinking fits into their scheming mindset. They've been trying to get away with it for some years now - especially on the telly - and they're not going to!

I'm glad that the chaps rebelled and put the PC Brigade in their place. OK, so in a few plays some men are dressed as women, but this isn't just a case of that. As Jerome suggests, 'there's no Month of History for Men. Usual sneaky Female bias creeping in.

Reply

13Ahmed Mechullah 4-16-2010 @ 5:30PM
Ah, yes, Zac, you are right. This, too, goes right against the Islamic way of thinking

Reply

14Zac Lawrence 4-16-2010 @ 5:35PM
You said: "and it was only going to be for a day anyways. That wouldn't be enough to give the boys the idea that wearing girls clothing is good, if that's what their fathers and mothers are thinks."

On the contrary! The fact that some of these boys reacted with such fear shows that it would have stuck in their minds (at such an impressionable age) for the rest of their lives. Besides, it's just one of those many 'bricks' in the PC Brigade's armory that builds the wall.

Reply

15mamas 4-16-2010 @ 5:40PM
hmm...I've noticed it's mainly women commenting in favor of little boys dressing as girls - I wonder why?

Recent research has shown that women in developed countries prefer more feminine looking men too.

What a world we're living in...


Reply

16Tiggy 4-16-2010 @ 5:42PM
What do they think they do at all boys schools when they do plays? For most of the history of theatre males have dressed as females. Wouldn't happen here - we have a respectable cross-dressing tradition in the UK!

Reply

17Zac Lawrence 4-16-2010 @ 5:41PM
You said: "and it was only going to be for a day anyways. That wouldn't be enough to give the boys the idea that wearing girls clothing is good, if that's what their fathers and mothers are thinks."

On the contrary! The fact that some of these boys reacted with such fear shows that it would have stuck in their minds (at such an impressionable age) for the rest of their lives. Besides, it's just one of those many 'bricks' in the PC Brigade's armory that builds the wall.

Reply


Reply

18Darren 4-16-2010 @ 5:47PM
The boys should of had a choice in the matter.Ive got a good idea to make it fair have the girls dress as cavemen!

Reply

19bee_me 4-16-2010 @ 5:49PM
psychological castration! yes! thank god someone with half a brain put a stop to that. can you imagine the consequences otherwise? some of the boys might have actually enjoyed it, might have learned the lesson that we don't necessarily have to fit into the social norms that 'society' have deemed 'appropriate' to be considered 'normal' or you you know, just had fun with it for what it was. dress up. they may then have gone on to be cross dressers in later life, of all things! or they may have just gone on to be nine years old with the fashion show a distant insignificant memory amidst all the growing up, moving on and the experiencing of the many other things life has to offer

Reply

20Ray 4-16-2010 @ 6:07PM
What a bunch of self-serving and willfully ignorant replies! Everyone in favour of this castration exercise seems to be conveniently overlooking a key detail: the boys were told they had no choice in the matter. It's all well and good to say people should be allowed to dress how they like - OF COURSE THEY SHOULD, THAT'S THE WHOLE PROBLEM!!! When you FORCE boys to dress as females (with the expressed intention of recording it for posterity, no less), you are giving them no choice, you are unjustly imposing personal values on them. The reaction has nothing to do with homophobia or fear that the boys "may find that they like it". It has to do frustration many fathers are feeling about the on-going femisinzation of young boys across numerous aspects of modern life (particularly in the educational system), and the increasingly unhidden thrill so many female "educators" are getting from enforcing it on the new generation of males.

Reply

| 1 | 2 |
Add your comments
New Users
Name


E-mail

Current Users
E-mail:


Password

Remember Me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:


Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
hool, Maude Wilkins Elementary, sent home letters to parents asking that they
Don update your email address
User avatar
critter
Part Timer
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Second star on the right and straight on till morning

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by critter »

Jim, once again you are confused. Social Security is not an "agreement" with the government. It is a form of social welfare called social insurance. It is there to ensure that our people don't starve, which is what they were doing during the Great Depression when the plan started. Yep, it's changed a lot over the years, but it is still social welfare.

Don't get me wrong, I don't begrudge you for having it or Joe for that matter. You see, I understand that social welfare is actually good for a civilised society. It reduces crime and increases growth rates. In fact, for every dollar spent on social welfare, six dollars are saved in the justice system. Just from a purely mathematics standpoint, social welfare is fiscally conservative.

Now, I think everything should be done to make sure that welfare is only available to those who really need it and also to prevent fraud, but I'm glad to pay my taxes so that you and Joe can be confused and hypocritical. In fact, have a beer on me, mate.

It is, however, both untrue, and hypocritical to insinuate that anyone who supports social programs is only looking for some kind of handout from the government, especially when you yourself are accepting a government handout.

Cheers!
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

This very thing is coming to the US, unless the politicians stand up and stop it now.... If they are not willing to, then the people must do it..............
*****************************************

Denmark - a must read!

This article could be seen as racist by some but on the other hand it could also be seen as a reflection of our own reality that somehow our politicians refuse to see. The interpretation is up to the reader, however it is food for thought...


SALUTE to Denmark... They are trying to fix a huge problem.

This could very well happen here on our Continent...


Susan MacAllen, a Canadian citizen, is a contributing editor for (FamilySecurityMatters.org)

Salute the Danish Flag - it's a Symbol of Western Freedom
By Susan MacAllen


In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.


The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.

The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?

By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, inequality for women, intolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.



An article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted, accurately, that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:

'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.'

'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.'

'Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.'

'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem.'

'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.'

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.

An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today, Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)

If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture, and a Danish language test.

You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship.

You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won't find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.

You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government's welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.'



'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,' Hvilshoj says, 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.'

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.


The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.

And meanwhile, Canadians clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in Canada look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history. We would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own.

________________________________________________________

Sent to me this morning, by a friend.

Joe Ribaudo
pippinwhitepaws
Expert
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by pippinwhitepaws »

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America



"promote the general welfare"

bastards need a prayer, and the ability to read and understand the constitution.
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

pip,

"bastards need a prayer, and the ability to read and understand the constitution."

They have many prayer's, and they all begin with Allahu Akbar, which is what they were screaming as they crashed those planes on Sept. 11

Why would they need to understand our constitution? Those concepts are the very reason they want to kill us all.

Joe Ribaudo
pippinwhitepaws
Expert
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by pippinwhitepaws »

nice sidestep punkassjoe.

YOR all for national defense, yet, while one person is hungry, one person is homeless, or one person is suffering without health care, every citizen of the united states of america is in violation of the constitution.

sidestep that punkassjoe.
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

Pip,

"YOR all for national defense, yet, while one person is hungry, one person is homeless, or one person is suffering without health care, every citizen of the united states of America is in violation of the constitution."

XXXXX was right, you do have "issues". :(

What if they don't want a home? What if they don't want to pay for health care? Would you remove all choice from American citizens? There are many places for the homeless to get shelter. Many won't go to those places because some of them like living on the streets.

Our Constitution does not give everyone the guarantee of a job, home, health care, or free anything. It does give every person the freedom to seek, "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness." What each person does with that freedom is up to them.

Some will work harder at achieving those goals, other will wait for some idiot to give it to them. Those that work harder will live better. Nothing else works......anywhere.

Are you still upset that the American Dream eludes you? Work harder!

Joe Ribaudo
pippinwhitepaws
Expert
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by pippinwhitepaws »

again dumbfuck you show the inability to comprehend.
where in the constitution does it say anyone has to pay?
no where punkassjoe.
again you dodge the topic and blame others for the existence of greedy punks like you who do legal drugs and prey on the elderly.
thats the american dream to fucks like you.
Joe Ribaudo
Expert
Posts: 5453
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:36 pm

Re: BLUEPRINT FOR DESTRUCTION!

Post by Joe Ribaudo »

Pip,

"where in the constitution does it say anyone has to pay?"

So, in your mind, if the Constitution doesn't say you have to pay for a specific item......it should be free. Nowhere does it say you have to pay for your own house, food, clothing or means of transportation. Do you understand that to mean that the government should supply all of that?

You do, I assume, realize that means those who do work and pay tax's would actually be the ones who would provide for everyone who doesn't work......but wants those things.

I understand that such a system has never worked, anywhere. Once people realize they don't need to work for anything, they won't. Eventually, the number of workers will shrink to a point where they can't supply all the non-workers with.......stuff.

Your attitude suggests that you are just not getting enough free......stuff. Perhaps you should try Cuba, or China. Don't be looking for that fancy car, or boat from the working class, as they can't get them either. Only the guys running the country get the good stuff.

Your old professor had you pegged perfectly when she said you have....."issues". Better get your shit together, or there won't be anyone left to smooth your furrowed brow when you have your little breakdowns.

I hope that happens soon, as a good mind should not go to waste.

Joe Ribaudo
Post Reply