a nation divided

Anything goes. Politics, religion and your neighbors spouse. No censors, no dictators. Any and all opinions welcome.
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

it's quite simple - when you quote, credit the quote to the real source. evidently that is too much to ask from you right wing nuts.
I posted a link. It was a vid. I posted the name and the topic of the vid.

You got some good shit didn't you? Focus duude. I keep telling you to focus but you have a hard time don't you? It'll help you in all aspects of your life. But you have to listen.

Once again......F O C U S!!!!
lbj
Part Timer
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:38 am

Post by lbj »

knun,
You got some good shit didn't you? Focus duude. I keep telling you to focus but you have a hard time don't you? It'll help you in all aspects of your life. But you have to listen.
that is what makes the right wing nut republicans irrelevant. you have no positions except "NO". you obviously have nothing to contribute to the debate so you attack my personality. that is a sure sign of weakness and defeat.

come back when you have some ideas to debate. until then go back into your closet.
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

Knun..hi,
Watched the u tube link........without knowing obviously the exact details of the proposed health plans,i can only comment generally...it seems to me that speaker was employing scare tactics for the purpose of self preservation for himself as a physician and for his colleagues in the private health care system.....he stated that if these plans went through many many doctors,physicians etc would leave the profession..i wonder why? in protest at socialised medecine? or in protest at losing an immensely lucrative position? These guys make me weep....respect for the patient....respect for the patients right to choose etc......its their own pockets these guys are concerned about,not their patients.
Whatever the rights and wrongs about this issue,i dont believe it has anything to do with obama making a merica a communist or socialist state,on the contrary i believe its most likely a genuine attempt to address the health concerns of the country ,and to make treatment more affordable for most,and more available for the poorest in society,and their ability to pay.
On a slightly different tack,that speech was similar to many made by industrialists ,business people and financiers over here,when the minimum wage was first suggested........its self interes..t involved.....business (and id include the private health care indudtry, as a business) have not the slightest interest in the common good,their only interest lies in balance sheets and big bucks....soo i expect to hear a few more speeches being made by these guys before its all over.
regards
Don update your email address
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Don,
You said,
it seems to me that speaker was employing scare tactics for the purpose of self preservation for himself as a physician and for his colleagues in the private health care system.....
Actually the majority of us Americans are perfectly happy with the health care we have. We like and are content with the system we have. You don't see bus loads of people going up to Canada. People of means are not going to your Country for treatment...they are coming here. Hell, if a capitalist was wise he would provide junkets from your Country to ours for timely healthcare.

If our system is so bad were are the stories of folks without the care they need? Yes, there are incidents here as there are everywhere. But where is the overwhelming eveidense to support the assinine notion that this system is not working?
he stated that if these plans went through many many doctors,physicians etc would leave the profession..i wonder why? in protest at socialised medecine? or in protest at losing an immensely lucrative position? These guys make me weep....respect for the patient....respect for the patients right to choose etc......its their own pockets these guys are concerned about,not their patients.
Your so misinformed about our system but it's understandable.

First I want to point out something once again. My Doctor accepts those less fortunate because they have the exact same insurance I have. Folks in need in Az. can get assistance from the state and that assistance provides the same choices for coverage that I have. I can choose from four different plans. Two are free two I pay for. The most expensive is $32 per month. They obviuosly do not have to pay but they have the same choices.

As an example of my care. I have the same doctor I had ten years ago. We call each other by our first name. I am familar with his family and he with mine. I turned fifty this year. We talked about my family history during the check-up I scheduled the week before. I told him I thought it would be best if I got a cardio stress test. He agreed it would be a good thing to do based on my family history. Two days later this was approved by my Insurance. My doctor recommended two Cardiologist offices to deal with. I asked him for his advise and he recommended one over the other. I called to set up the appointment to meet the cardio doc. They said next Weds. I said that wouldn't work for me. So I had to wait two weeks. Bare in mind those in need get that same care. Now with my care I do have a copay up to a certain point. I pay 20% up to $800 for the year. Once I pay the $800 everything is covered.
Whatever the rights and wrongs about this issue,i dont believe it has anything to do with obama making a merica a communist or socialist state,on the contrary i believe its most likely a genuine attempt to address the health concerns of the country ,and to make treatment more affordable for most,and more available for the poorest in society,and their ability to pay.

Actually it has everything to do with Obama trying to Socialize this Country. There is absolutley no reason to change what we have. Should we make it better and more affordable? Of course! But the same should be said for every socialized healthcare system in the world. Yours is on the top of the list for reform....much more so than ours.

I've told you this many times but you seem to discredit it every time. The poorest in our society are covered with healthcare today. In Az. they have the exact same care as I do. Every one of them. Every person legal or not can go to an emergency room for care. Legal or not. Rich or poor.

Respectfully Don,
Your totally misinformed about our Healthcare system here in the states. Ask yourself why those that can, from your country, come here to have their lives saved! Same with the Canadians. The same with the entire world. Why would they come here? Then from a global view.....why would you want us to change? Where then would you go???
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

Hi knun,
Of course im not as informed about the american system as i maybe should be.Im observing from a distance plainly....However ive read of people having to give up their homes to pay medical bills,people being cut off from cover because they reached their benefit limit,or being refused cover because of their long term medical needs....are these stories true or false? if true,then plainly there is a problem,if lies then someone should pursue those lies and show everyone that that is the case.I am not talking about the odd report ,there seems to be an awful lot of people who say (or have said) the same thing.
Its also said that the private insurers employ a whole army of accountants to find ways to escape their insurance obligations.If that is just to uncover fraudelent claims etc..all well and good,but logic might hint thart its more to do with saving money by any means possible......And of course if there isnt an issue,then why are so many people determined to fix it?
Ive "spoke" or listened to other americans on various forums,who mainly have said that the ONE and ONLY reason that they voted Democrat in this last election was purely because of Obamas promise to alter the jhealth care system.Though to be honest they also said that they doubt if he will actually do what he says.....though one can live in hope.
As for your statement that "people with means dont come to Britain for treatment" ..of course they wouldnt-theres no need ..if they have "means"....but of course for the wealthy theres no problem .
I think that the majority in britain value the national health service...there have been howls of protest,demonstrations and the like when part privatisation of the NHS plans have been put forward ........except from the wealthier part of the population,which is understandable, I guess.
Here is part of a page regarding the american health system......true? false? somewhere between the two?






Public health versus private health: understanding the differences can be literally life and death for a society or civilization. The US has been slowly bankrupting itself providing exotic healthcare for all sorts of personal things including annoying sexual performance problems in the gnome community (viagra!). The US under serves public healthcare while overspending on private healthcare and this is putting us at a severe disadvantage in trade as well as driving our government off the cliff (of course, our many wars are also at fault here).

.

As per usual, the US public writhes with fear, agony and partisan anger as we try, for the umpteenth time, to develop a national health program that is as useful and frugal as 80% of the top manufacturing nations on earth. The health statistics for the US public are miserable. We rank below nearly all of Europe and many Asian countries in longevity, child health and maternal deaths. Yet we have the most expensive medical complex system on earth.

.

It is a mirror of our military/industrial complex. Expensive, totally out of touch with pressing matters, focused mostly on cosmetic appearances and impossible to change. And is bankrupting us. The twin forces of our extravagant military and our deluxe but nonfunctional health systems are tearing our nation apart and both will ultimately destroy our entire civilization if not reined in, somehow.

.

One very bad problem we have, concerning healthcare, is differentiating between what is for the public good and what is private. We are a collective. Anyone who thinks he is an island, should move to one and not leave it. The rest of us live in the middle of an ocean of humanity, all of us are interconnected in a wide variety of ways.

.

One way we are connected is, we share the same breathing spaces. That is, people breathe in and out all over the place (unless they are holding their breath!) and viruses love this aspiration methodology to aspire to multiply via coughing or sneezing. When did the first virus evolve to spread via breathing? We don’t know but I bet, it was around the same time the first amphibians began to walk on dry land.

.

When the first Labyrinthodontia came toddling ashore, it probably cast a glance over to another Labyrinthodontia and said, ‘My nose itches. *Achoo*’. The other one said, ‘Gesundheit,’ and then went back into the water only it felt awfully sick the next day. Long before the ruling elites tried to get rich, running the G7 nations, the real pests were the Virus Empire and the Bacterial Kingdom. These two conglomeration of single celled party poopers have a long and stellar history of out-evolving all other life forms. More about that later.

.

One of the main functions of any civilization that wishes to exist for very long is to deal with the Virus Empire and the Bacterial Kingdom and to keep them either at bay or under control. Anytime a government loses control of these two dire bio armies, chaos and death ensue. Out of curiosity, since I dislike simply assuming anything, here is a useful timeline about US public healthcare:

.

Health Care Law: U.S. Health Care Timelines

1796: Congress refused to give the federal government authority to quarantine people with contagious diseases
1879: First federal quarantine program established (allowed to expire in 1884)
1887: Public Health Service opened one-room lab in Staten Island marine hospital to do research on bacteria, vaccines, and quarantine techniques — forerunner of National Institutes of Health 50 years later
1902: Biologics Control Act enacted to regulate quality of vaccines and sera
1906: Food and Drug Act enacted to prevent manufacture, sale, or transportation of (harmful) food, drugs, medicine, or liquor
1912: Children’s Bureau established
1917: Public Health Service facilities authorized to provide medical care to WWI veterans with service-connected disabilities; extended in 1933 to include medical and domiciliary care to all veterans of any war since 1897, regardless of whether disabilities were service-connected
1918: Chamberlain-Kahn Act authorized first federal grants to states for public health services (for control of venereal disease)
1933: Federal Emergency Relief Administration provided limited medical, dental, and nursing services for the medically indigent
1935: Social Security Act enacted to provide retirement and death benefits, a federal/state unemployment compensation system, federal grants to states in developing public health programs, and cash benefits to dependent children, the blind, and, in 1952, the disabled. Employer and employee contributions implemented in 1937 with each contributing 1% of first $3,000 of wages. No general health benefits were included.
1945: Harry Truman was first president to present an official administration proposal for national health insurance to Congress
.

First off, Congress wanted everything to be state’s rights issues. So, if a state didn’t give a hoot or holler if vast plagues swept their own population (i.e.: the slave states) then, people would die left and right. It is amazing to see how people can’t think very well: slaves were ’subhuman’ (see: Hitler’s Master race ideology) so it didn’t matter all that much if the slaves got sick. The idea that illnesses sweeping through the wretched quarters of the field hand slaves could migrate to the Big House and kill the master’s children, baffled slave owners. After all, they thought, slaves were NOT humans at all so how could they give the ‘real’ humans (Massa and his cuddly kids) any diseases?

.

We take for granted the idea that we know that germs cause diseases. Unfortunately, this is false. It wasn’t even an American that found out about germs, it was a Frenchman. And this revelation occurred at about the same time my godmother, who died at 105 years in 1964, was born!

.

Louis Pasteur Quick Facts – Quick Facts – MSN Encarta

December 27, 1822

.

Death September 28, 1895

.

Place of Birth Dole, France

.

Known for Founding microbiology

.

Proposing the germ theory of disease, in which diseases arise from naturally existing microorganisms, not from spontaneous generation, the supposed formation of disease-causing organisms from nonliving matter

.

Inventing the process of pasteurization

.

Developing a vaccine for rabies

.

Pasteur proved that diseases were NOT caused by living in sin or reading racy French novels or going to ballets or engaging in politics. He proved that many things people did to foil death were either futile or downright dangerous. For example, he campaigned hard to get doctors to WASH THEIR HANDS between patients. The medical profession thought that was very stupid. The death rate of mothers, due to doctors refusing to wash their hands, was very ferocious.

.

The US public health system has to pay close attention to collective health problems: things that spread via breathing, touching, sexual intercourse, sweat, urine, feces and farming methods. These MUST be attended to and regulated. People have to cooperate with various energetic programs to prevent epidemics, pandemics and the evolution of germs. That is, if people don’t do the right things with existing therapies and medicines, diseases evolve rapidly to overturn these cures. Thus, the need for public input on dealing with say, TUBERCULOSIS.

.

That dread disease is now spreading and it is resistant to modern medicines. Draconian measures must be taken but aren’t being taken, to stop this menace. Another public health menace is malaria. This, too, has evolved to the point, it no longer is stopped by modern medicines. Usually, these diseases occur when private poverty prevents patients from following the entire course of a cure. So they stop halfway and the disease surges back, often, mutating while doing this.

.

To keep up with these diseases, we need public funding of research labs. The major drug companies don’t like this sort of research, it is not all that profitable. They far rather research sexual enhancement drugs, or stuff that can be used for cosmetic surgery. Vanity drives a huge sector of healthcare research and profits. So universities are often the place where our new research comes from:

.

U.S. researchers find ’signature’ of common virus | Deals | Regulatory News | Reuters

Common viruses that cause colds and flu leave a distinctive signature in the blood, and U.S. researchers said on Thursday they had found a way to pin it down.

. The researchers hope to develop a test that will tell a doctor quickly whether a patient has a common cold, influenza or some other infection, and help guide treatment options.


. “This work is still in a relatively early phase of discovery, but we are optimistic that these findings may lead to a whole new way of diagnosing infectious disease,” Dr. Geoffrey Ginsburg of Duke University in North Carolina, who led the study, said in a statement.

. Most respiratory infections look similar — cough, sneezing, fever, headache and fatigue. There are no good quick tests and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study, also on Thursday, showing on-the-spot flu tests miss up to half of all flu infections. [ID:nN06348322]….

..


…The biggest value, they said, may be in helping doctors tell who has viral pneumonia and who has bacterial pneumonia. It is useless to treat viral infections with antibiotics.

. “It could mean more appropriate use of antibiotics. Overuse of antibiotics can lead to the emergence of drug-resistant pathogens, and no one wants to see more of that,” Dr. Christopher Woods of Duke said in a statement




.

Way back in my youth, I was 100% against feeding antibiotics to farm animals. Yes, they gain weight faster and live longer when we do this but the germs mutate over time and destroy the value of antibiotics to the MAJOR PUBLIC. Again: private farm producers are endangering the greater public because they want bigger profits from bigger animals.

.

A government should stop them from doing this but of course, the big aggie guys pay Congress lots of money to not stop them so they merrily destroyed the value of antibiotics during the last 50 years.

.

Massive beef recall linked to antibiotic-resistant salmonella outbreak

California firm Beef Packers Inc has recalled over 800,000 pounds of ground beef linked to an outbreak of antibiotic-resistant salmonella that has sickened people across nine states.

.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued the alert yesterday for a range of the company’s ground beef products processed between June 5-23 that were sent to retail distribution centres in Arizona, California, Colorado and Utah. The 825,769 pounds (375,349 kg) of meat had been repackaged into consumer-size amounts and sold under different retail brand names. Consumers were warned to check with local retailer to find out if they were at risk.

.

Thank you, Big Factory Farming Aggie Guys! This salmonella is ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT!!! Good gods. And this was so easy to predict. The way we abuse antibiotics and other drugs used to stop dangerous diseases is part of the public/private healthcare matrix. We cannot pretend that ‘to each his own’ is OK. Medical anarchy=death.

.

BBC NEWS | Health | Are we losing the war on bugs?

We now know that the bacteria behind the current outbreak of pneumonic plague in China – Yersinia pestis – started out life as a fairly harmless inhabitant of the intestine before acquiring a gene which allowed it to infect insects, and then return to humans with devastating effects.

. The strain of E.coli meanwhile which has just left two people seriously ill is a mutant form of the bacterium which lives without causing any trouble in cattle, but can be a killer in humans when it is picked up after touching an animal or eating undercooked, infected food. .

Campylobacter jejuni, another cause of bacterial food poisoning, have developed cells with different surfaces: this means that even if most of them are recognised and killed by the host’s immune system, some of them will escape and proliferate. Which is what those which have developed resistance to antibiotics are also able to do. Campaigns have been launched aimed at reducing unnecessary use of treatments amid a rising number of resistant strains.

. While MRSA rates have fallen dramatically, others - notably antibiotic resistant E. coli strains which cause infections of the urinary tract and the blood – are on the increase.

. “Sensible prescribing is part of the answer but we also need new antibiotics - it’s not one of the most attractive areas for pharmaceutical companies as people don’t take them for very long, unlike treatments for heart disease or cancer,” says Dr David Livermore, an infections expert at the Health Protection Agency.

.

Grrr….if anyone thinks eating right and living a ‘virtuous’ life will protect them from tuberculosis or the plague… that is just nutty! Of course, it is good to eat healthy, be sanitary and to exercise but none of these activities will protect one from the major deadly diseases that are resurgent. On top of this, businesses making drugs don’t like dealing with these things, they want to find drugs we have to take all our lives. Bingo: big profits, little work.

.

Below is a PEW study about antibiotics being abused by farmers:

.

National Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production



Final Report: Putting Meat on The Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America

Executive Summary CLICK HERE PDF (2.7 MB)
Full Report CLICK HERE PDF (6.2 MB)

Frequently Asked Questions CLICK HEREPDF (164 KB)

.

Every day, doctors use antibiotics to treat thousands of sick children and adults. Humans depend on these life-saving medicines for their personal health. But did you know that as much as 70 percent of all antibiotics sold in the U.S. are being fed to cattle, swine, and poultry on industrial animal farms, for purposes other than treating disease?

. Click here to learn more about how antibiotic use in food production threatens human health in the Human Health and Industrial Farming program by The Pew Charitable Trusts

.

What puzzles me is how some people get on various strange bandwagons. For example, getting hysterical about fluoride. While at the same time, being la-de-dah about very serious potential plagues. This refusal to look at big things while getting anxious about small things is very human. We feel unease when we confront the greater forces. So we focus on trivialities.

.

Water pollution from all sorts of things such as hormone drugs, antidepressants, industrial wastes, street runoffs, etc, are much more deadly and much more serious and are PUBLIC HEALTH issues, not private issues. The right wing refuses to figure this out. I cannot fathom why but then, they also trend towards wanting ‘faith’ rather than ‘reason’ when dealing with the world. So things can be overlooked. But overlooking our public health has a very steep price. That is, masses of humans can die.

.

For example, stopping the nuclear bomb tests was critical for stopping the rising cancer rates that have now killed MILLIONS of people. Millions have died in this ’silent nuclear war’ and are still dying! Yet, during the entire episode in world history, the major nuclear powers all denied that nuclear bombs caused cancer. While all of these same nations were trying to help us with public health care initiatives!

.

Humans are very paradoxical creatures! One last thing:

.

BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | Extinction hits ‘whole families’

Whole “chunks of life” are lost in extinction events, as related species vanish together, say scientists.

.

A study in the journal Science shows that extinctions tend to “cluster” on evolutionary lineages – wiping out species with a common ancestor…. .

…Many species have become extinct during the relatively stable periods between those global calamities. But even during such quiet periods, the team found that extinctions tended to cluster into evolutionary families – with closely-related species of clams vanishing together more often than would be predicted by chance…. .

…According to this pattern, the study’s authors point out, extinctions are likely to eliminate entire branches of the evolutionary tree.

.

We saw with Dutch Elm Disease, how species can be wiped out by mere germs. The roster of living things killed by the Viral Empire and the Bacterial Kingdom is long and dread. They both have rung down the curtain on many, many life forms and we must take them seriously. Which is also why we have to shut down military germ labs! Gah!!! These are extremely noxious.



Email:

[email protected]


MAILING ADDRESS:

EMS NEWS

P.O. BOX 483

BERLIN, NY 12022

Make checks out to ‘Elaine Supkis’




CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO THIS WEBSITE








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

PANDEMIC PARANOIA
SWINE FLU FEAR VIDEO
In defense of the public health plan
A New Campaign to Fight Diseases of the Wealthy
28 Comments
Filed under evolution

28 Comments

PLovering
August 8, 2009 at 3:17 am
Only a Second American Revolution can save us from the Nazi swine.

“Up to 9 out of 10 rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu”are wrong, finds CDC study
August 6, 2009 by JB

According to MSNBC, the CDC has found that rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu” can be wrong as much as nine times out of ten. The “best” test was wrong half the time, the CDC found.

The government study indicating that rapid tests to diagnose the “swine flu” could hardly distinguish between the “swine flu” and normal seasonal flu gives support to those medical experts who say the “swine flu” is a harmless, ordinary flu that is being hyped by the WHO and the vaccine companies to justify a pandemic level 6 declaration and mass forced vaccinations.

The CDC checked the efficiency of rapid tests made by three companies. The tests correctly confirmed swine flu infections only 10 percent to 51 percent of the time, and the tests were better at diagnosing seasonal flu.”

The report can be found here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32316348/ns ... swine_flu/

mey
August 8, 2009 at 4:20 am
“Only a Second American Revolution can save us from the Nazi swine.”

What does this mean? What is “Nazi swine”? How does a Second American Revolution save us from this? Please explain, because I’m extremely confused by this sentence. Maybe it’s some code words or dog whistles I’m supposed to understand, but I really don’t.

emsnews
August 8, 2009 at 5:06 am
The dog whistle is, since science can’t be perfect, we should do nothing but sit around with a finger stuck in our mouths, hoping nothing will happen.

GEEZE: the MSNBC news means we need more money for research in new systems, eh? Note that my story was very clear about both the need for this and why major medical corporations do NOT want to work on any of this (far less profits than viagra!!!)

PS: we already know this is NOT an ‘ordinary’ flu since it is killing people who normally barely notice ‘normal’ flues. I hope this detail is easy to understand.

nah
August 8, 2009 at 5:30 am
As per usual, the US public writhes with fear, agony and partisan anger as we try, for the umpteenth time, to develop a national health program that is as useful and frugal as 80% of the top manufacturing nations on earth.
.
Government is just 2 big and wasteful to sell realism into a subsidized monopolized market place inundated with cronie capitolists. So if we get a change in healthcare, its just going to give us more management, the subsidized health system will see to that
.
im alive cuz of nukes and penicillin… so thats alln’ all pretty wiked… I like to think that the height of mans achievements requires posterity and vibrant societys, so im in favor of germ research and hi tech dna cure stuff….
.
but cows, man, dogs, ants need to grow in the most natural way possible…. the environment stimulates us to develop into the very same… too much man manufactured junk that cleanses the molecular interactions of life from our organs is in my mind scientific vanity… we dont need isolation, its snot and poop and sweat that is humanity
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOO5ofUk4xI&NR=1
.
snot and poop and sweat

two beers
August 8, 2009 at 5:42 am
Is PLovering saying that Obama’s a socialfascist who is forcing the Mengele doctors to try to prevent us from contracting swine flu, and that the only way we can prevent this liberal nazi conspiracy is by taking up arms against the brown horde in Washington?

I hope he’s being ironic, or that I’m totally misreading him, because otherwise, this type of anti-democratic (small d) lunacy poses a greater threat to the republic than any virus ever could.

The only entity on earth that can destroy us is….us.

two beers
August 8, 2009 at 5:53 am
Why do opponents of universal coverage hate America so much? Do they think we are incompetent, immoral, weak, lazy? Aren’t we #1? Didn’t we put a man on the moon? Are the following countries better than we are? Why are they all able to offer forms of universal health coverage, but we can’t?

Argentina, Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Cuba, Costa Rica, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Sweden, South Korea, UK….

Not to mention the universal care we US tazpayers pay for citizens of Afghanistan and Iraq!

What a country!

larry, dfh
August 8, 2009 at 6:24 am
But it really is very regulated by the gov’t. Try opening a med school, or a hospital. Try putting up a shingle with ‘Medical Doctor” on it. State medical boards have been given the right to determine who is fit to practice medicine, and that has been turned into ‘how many doctors can we tolerate before prices are driven down?’ Med schools are largely tax-exempt organizations, as are many hospitals. They are subsidized by the taxpayers with the net result that competition is limited and costs are kept high. And whatever obammy and the dems come up with will favor the insurance companies over the taxpayers.
And yes, the big unreported story is the amount of antibiotics fed to food animals. Farm-raising salmon is a big one, as the excess goes right into the water. Salmon don’t have a real strong immune system; since they are constantly swimming, any sick ones get left behind. But when they are confined in a pen their whole lives, they need antibiotics or the whole crop could die. I don’t think catfish have the same problem, but I don’t know.
And don’t forget the D.U., another wonderful product of the nuclear arms industry that will continue to poison for the next 90 billion years.

Aussie email writer
August 8, 2009 at 7:28 am
Re Public health versus private health:…

I agree with Elaine and with horror witnessed how less fortunate Americans suffer because they can’t afford health care – refer: http://www.youtube.com/aljazeeraenglish ... ex7Qv8IEnQ

Australia has no local owned pharma manufacturing company and the US has several top Global Fortune 100 pharma co’s.
Yet our Federal Health entity thru its sole national buying power can negotiate lowest price deals (for medicine provided under medicare’s health nenefits listed medicine) with your US pharma co’s.
The result, for example, my daughter’s anti pschotic medication (for schizophrenia) costs A$5/month/one medicine when the Recommended retail Price (RRP) for Clozapine is A$650 alone!!

Yet the unfortunate American citizen pays the full price under the deal being negotiated by Obama with the same US pharma co.

I have a worldwide biotech patent and know something about the alleged corrupt and powerfull pharma industry.
Most of their new patented medication was invented by small companies and universities subsidized by the public purse in both our countries and others worldwide.

Elaine correctly suggests the US chronically serial wars and the present health care battles are corporate and institutionally driven for profit considerations direct and indirectly at the expense of your common man interests.

We all want democracy and a free market society because it remains the best available in our imperfect world. The problem in both our countries is the balance of power between public (our common good) and the private good no longer works because the government no longer represents the voter.

We in Australia are ussually about 10 years behind the US and therefore our present concerns are less severe than yours.

Please take my comments as goodwill will from a human being empathises with your predicament and the double standards reflected in the way your pharma treats you and me so differently.

JT
August 8, 2009 at 8:08 am
I´ve been following the debate on healthcare in US and it just seems not to be a debate about the healthcare at all.
Only spreading fear and rumors about “socialized medicine”.

Here in scandinavia health care is organized by municipalities and the state then helps the poorest municipalities with the costs. The most advanced treatments are given in five regional University Hospitals that are funded by surrounding municipalities and the state. Doctors study and are trained in these University Hospitals.

Just a few things about healthcare here and we have our problems nothing is perfect but a few examples:

a if you get sick you can just go to your regional clinic (usually there´s a clinic in every city burrough) and see a doctor, if needed you are then referred to a specialist or tests and treatment. And it costs 11 € / month (not free anymore, but anyone can go whenever their sick 24/7). And if needed whatever treatment you need it´s free (cancer, hearth bypass whatever). The treatment is free.
Why it´s cheaper? I think because we run less unnecessary tests on patients.
And going to a health care clinic is the right of every citizen, everyone can just walk in and see a doctor. And people don´t go just for the fun of it, who wants to go to the doctor when they aren´t sick? Nobody. It´s much more of a problem that us typical stubborn finnish males don´t go even when we should.

b we have private hospitals, dentist, doctors practices etc and you can go get treated there if you want, nobody is stopping you. Municipalities also buy services from the private sector when their resources are full.

c public dentist for example handle only acute cases (broken tooth, cavities), but for a total overhaul of your teeth you go to a private dentist and the government reimburses you about 30% of the charges.

d. children and pregnant women go to Neuvola baby clinics (place of advice) during and after the pregnancy. It´s all free.

f. every school (up till 16 years of age) has a doctors clinic about once week. these doctors also handle the evil vaccinations. And children get checkups a few times a year + you can go if you feel sick. Free.

e. Drugs are not free but for the approved medicines you are reimbursed 42% of the price of medication. If you are really poor you are reimbursed 100%.

And it´s expensive. The total tax rate is 45% of all your income in scandinavia (income, vat, gas etc).

Why this will not work in the US? Here we are a homogenous society and strongly believe in equal rights, equal education and equal care for all citizens. Education is also free and we believe everyone should have the same chance for it no matter how rich or poor your parents are.
In the US the people of means would never go to the same clinic with the riff raff. Here they do.
The services are planned on need basis and cost effiency (prevention is the most cost efficient way of treating people).

US is a society based on money and huge social differences. I doubt this would ever work there.

emsnews
August 8, 2009 at 12:28 pm
JT, my husband has brain damage due to workplace chemical poisoning and he takes the same drugs your daughter takes, we don’t have to pay for it since the state has to pay 100%.

Keep courage with your daughter! My husband and I count each day as a victory when he can overcome the difficulties of a mind that won’t think right. I send my love to you all.

Now, as for the public healthcare phobia in the US: we generally were the laggard nation when it came to healthcare for everyone. Germany had it long, long before the US began to even think about it. France heartily went for it when the US was reluctant to even believe in the concept of ‘germs’.

NYC was far, far, far ahead of the entire nation in all these matters thanks very much to the influx of immigrants, especially the educated people who brought modern social concepts from Europe to the US.

If we look at the public health timeline in the story above, we can see that NYC was the first in many of these health matters.

Sharkbabe
August 8, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I have a good friend in Belgium and one in France, both female, both considerably younger than I. Neither of them can begin to get their heads around the healthcare inhumane extortionist bullshit we submit to here. They can barely fathom it.

Sad for us and our darkness, good for them and their young lives.

emsnews
August 8, 2009 at 3:18 pm
I had no health insurance several times in my life. It was pure hell. I am furious that our government can’t get its head around this simple technical problem as to how to give us good health coverage.

w.c.
August 8, 2009 at 3:40 pm
ems

your husbands industrial accident ,, should have been covered by workers comp,, ‘does he also draw some sort of wage ,, to compensate… plus hospital care and drugs,

is this paid for by the state . or workers comp,

how long ago did this happen .. bless your heart for taking care of your husbands needs ..

ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ

ELAINE: My husband was the photographer for the geologists and biologists with the State Museum complex. They cut off his air supply while he was working in a sealed dark room. Serious brain damage, he almost died that day.

It turned an Eagle Scout/hunter/bike racer/skiier/swordfighter into an invalid. We won our cases in court and the state has to pay for everything but it fixes none of the things my husband lost. He would rather be a poor Eagle Scout/hunter/bike racer/skiier/swordfighter than an invalid. Thanks to inflation, our funds fall lower and lower and now, I no longer use heating you have to buy, I go out all summer long (I’m about 60 years old) with my tractor and harvest firewood, split it and stack it.

We were cheated. But then, we have a home and we have a garden, a forest and we have faith that we can win in the end and we have loving children who surround us and will look after us when we get too old.

Paul S
August 8, 2009 at 3:58 pm
ANY “Free” market talk re health care is completely dishonest, for a number of reasons. One, the so-called free market can NOT be applied when it comes to health care. No one chooses to be a diabetic, no one chooses to have a heart condition, etc.. And no one can say, “I am not going to buy this heart medication, it’s too expensive.”

Only if people COULD choose, then there would be a free market dynamic. The health care industry has a captive customer base and they take full advantage of this. Second, for all their professed love of “Free” markets, the drug companies are heavily subsidized for their R&D courtesy of the US taxpayer.

Then they make their drugs in China (don’t put any lead in my Xanax, thank you very much.)–then gouge the consumer on price. Big Insurance gets a huge subsidy too. They are allowed to cherry pick whomever they want to insure and ignore everyone else. This explains why William Obrien, CEO of United Health Group, can make $120 million in salary and $250 million in stock options, (Obrien was caught in a stock backdating scandal, so he had to give a bunch of the stock back–no prison of course.

At least he didn’t bounce a check for 20 bucks.heh.) The WHOLE health care system, as is, is structured for maximum profit, which means NO competition. It’s amusing to hear the healthcare shills scream about how government can’t do anything, like healthcare, right. This even though we have very successful medical care with Medicare/Medicaid and the VA. Here’s an example of the lies the healthcare lobby spouts: on a call-in type talk show, a caller claimed to know how Canada’s healthcare system works.

The caller made the claim that he knew for a FACT that Canada had only THREE MRI machines. I did some research. Canada has around 250 MRI machines. Amazing. Just bald faced LIES from the healthcare lackeys/lobbyists. I also am amused by the right wing talk radio whores–like the oxycontin kid, Rush Limbaugh.

Every one of these guys knows a Canadian member of Parliament who comes down to the US for medical care. Amazing coincidence isn’t it? And RIGHT in time for the health care debate here in the US. I must say, being a Canadian member of Parliament is a dangerous job. Alot of them seem to get cancer and need to come to the US for medical care. Maybe it’s that cold Canadian air? Finally, there is the business lobby.

They want their cake and eat it too. On the one hand, they HATE paying health insurance premiums, which is a big reason why they outsource. And this outsourcing mainly includes the 40+ age group of employees. BUT: employers don’t want to lose their big bargaining chip, health care insurance. So the Chamber of Commerce fights healthcare reform even though it would cost employers LESS money if we had a public option style health care system. Sleazy. Just plain sleazy.

ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ

ELAINE: Dear Paul, I stuck in paragraph spaces so people will read this wonderful posting. People tend to skip over long boxes of text. It is a visual thing which is part of how the script looks on a computer. I hope you don’t mind me doing this. I want to thank you for posting.

w.c.
August 8, 2009 at 4:18 pm
workers comp insurance

some monolistics states that have just a state run system are charging more for workers comp premium than those states that allow competition,

nevada ,, program run by the state was a complete disastor,, montania, was so far in the red. private companys had to bail them out,, california has some of the highest rates in the nation as a public carrier,,

workers comp as a whole has a pretty effective program .. over seen by state regulators on the local level , all workers are covered the minute the walk on a work site.. Hawaii has coverage from the hearth,, to the work place ..meaning the minute they leave hone to go to work they are covered.

the health program with the right state administration and proper deductables could in my opinion be much more effective state by state than a federal program .

washington has a monolistic system in comp and some of the highest comp rates in nation,,, their health insurance regulations are so strict that premium are so high,, that it drivers out any option .

have the proper health system in place with deductables set.. yadda

then send all claims not covered to washington. and for a couple of aircraft carriers .. all claims can be covered ..

emsnews
August 8, 2009 at 5:45 pm
It is very hard to get workman’s comp in NY state. My husband was seriously disabled and at one hearing, was in the hospital! Yet, the state kept saying he could work. For five long years, we went in and out of court and had NO MONEY AT ALL.

We lived in a tent complex my son and I built out of scrap material from the town dump. We grew food in summer, hunted in winter, we went to food pantries, my son got shoes from school fundraisers because the teachers felt sorry for him, we got our clothing from the town dump.

Then, we won. The back payments paid for my building materials for my house which my son and I and some friends built so we would have no mortgage (we can’t afford one).

The system is set up so if you have no support, you die if it goes to court. If you do have support, you use up all your savings (we had savings, thank god! It paid for our medical bills! Used every penny).

Luckily for us, the last judge was asked by the state lawyers to give yet another delay. But my son told the judge that we were living in a tent for 5 years and he wanted to be able to buy shoes for once. The judge actually cried.

He then ruled in our favor and told us, ‘The state will pay everything very fast, I assure you’. And he had the check hand delivered to our tent complex just to see if it was real. He was bowled over to see how we managed to live on nearly nothing for 5 years.

w c
August 8, 2009 at 6:01 pm
emsnews
August 8, 2009 at 5:45 pm

so N.Y, State was a state run workers comp program ..

was private w.c. allowed .. is it now ,, i think so ,,
so lets turn stuff over to the state lol

wait years for coverage.. i have been involved with insurance for thirty years aND SOME OF THE STUFF i read .. i just scratch my head.. never5 had these problems ..

peoploe bought coverage..cliam were settled with no problems ,,

mANY HAVE no clue about THE INSURANCE INdustry .. and its need in all commerce and business..

sure some horror storys’ goes with ever thing in life government is not the solution,,

then the horror stories will really appear

in fact i set on the board of a private workers comp company.

Paul S
August 8, 2009 at 6:28 pm
If I could add one more thing. A number of states have adopted one form or another of uninsured health care. Why does it have (so far) a checkered track record? The same reason you see the “astroturf” lobbyists at the Town Hall meetings now. Big Pharma, Big Insurance have a vested interest in publicly financed healthcares failure. Many times, the stated benefits of the program can NOT in any way be funded due to inadequate funding. This is done deliberately so politicians will have some cover when they say, “Now ya see, the private sector is the only place we will get REAL solutions for healthcare.” Properly funded, the system will work; the VA system shows it can and will work.

w.c.
August 8, 2009 at 6:43 pm
ralph

in my opinion you know beans about insurance ,,

so much yabber ,, with little substance ,,

w.c.
August 8, 2009 at 6:49 pm
lets see how the government runs motors

last cash for clunkers .. bought trucks , and cost 45,000 a deal..now 2 billion more for a program of govenment run flunkies,,

their is a way but people refuse to read and have the brain power to comprehend ,

and i WILL bet noboDy has opened the book capitalism by reisman and read two pages with any understaNDING .

ems have you. or you druther fume lol

buffalo_ken
August 8, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Paul S. – nicely reasoned.

____________________

Insurance – just now it is “bad”.

You know about “derivatives” don’t ya? They suck. They try to suck all the funds their way, but the problem for them is that the funds are fiat – so they never had real standing in the first place. Go back and study 1913 – Jekyll Island and such.

So the derivatives are pulling a vacuum because there is nothing left to pull.

So that is why the derivatives are now about to learn what “gravity” really means.

Just my opinion.

_________________

as an aside just today a tree fell down on a power line nearby my home…..but the fire department came, then the police, then the technicians and they did a good job making reparations (so to speak).

funny because it was just in front of (ok – shameless plug to follow) the property discussed in the following story if you are so inclined:

http://www.kjh-es.net/

Some things are just too funny to even be real. No matter, I link the above site here for the sake of some cross-linking in the even that my site refuses to publish in the future. I hope you can understand.

ps – I have recently learned so much about Vista – from MS. Oh, the stories I could tell….maybe later.

PLovering
August 8, 2009 at 8:24 pm
“What does this mean? What is “Nazi swine”?

@mey

Welcome all pilgrims.

Take 9/11: You do know that the five Israelis jumping up and down on top of the car in the parking lot (while the WTC was imploding) were arrested, questioned, and finally flown back to Israel where they appeared on TV saying, “Yes, we were there to document the event.”

Depopulation & Genocide … read Rockefeller and other quotes:

http://www.whale.to/b/genocide_q.html

Swine Flu Vaccine adjuvant “Squalene” caused GWS (Gulf War Syndrome). Soldiers
left swinging in the wind. Read Gary Matsumoto.

http://www.vaccine-a.com/intro.html

The Depression of 2010 is no accident. It was documented, chapter and verse, in briefing papers handed to the new Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, in 1998.

Remembering that Rockefeller is in favor of depopulation and euthanasia, check his outrageous statement in favor of ramming the Health bill through with a simple majority:

“Our job is to make sure that we’re undeterred–undeterred by what we hear at town hall meetings and what we read and what we watch…. It’s an easy choice. You go for getting the bill by whatever means you have to, stretching the bipartisanship as far as you can. If that works, fine. If it doesn’t, then go on to something else, but you’ve got to get the bill. You have to have the bill.”

Hope this helps.

buffalo_ken
August 8, 2009 at 8:58 pm
There are so many easy ways to save on health care. So many. So many – it is so obvious.

So, on the opposite, because this is so obvious, then so is something else.

Obvious as pudding.

ziff house
August 9, 2009 at 4:32 pm
”9/11: You do know that the five Israelis jumping up and down on top of the car in the parking lot (while the WTC was imploding) were arrested, questioned, and finally flown back to Israel where they appeared on TV saying, “Yes, we were there to document the event.”

YES!! that one is true, i remember 20/20 did a piece on this right after the event. It it is now long forgotten.

Re your health care, another example of the information muddle machine you live under. There was a good piece in the NY’er about how in some parts of the country the system is run to maximize profits for doctors!

Ed-M
August 10, 2009 at 12:43 am
@two beers: I recall reading somewhere on the web that China, when she modernized and adopted capitalism, patterned her health care system after the medical industry / private health insurance model that is still prevalent here. The service became so bad and the prices so high, that the Chinese people complained bitterly to the central government. Result? China went back to the old people’s republic health service!

Ed-M
August 10, 2009 at 12:52 am
@JT, I think you hit on the real reason why so many people of means here in the US do not want universal(ly insured) health care: they might have to go to the same clinic as the riff raff! Plus, the riff raff would receive just as good care as them!

Due to segregation by race and class in this country, the former would be absolutely impossible.

Ed-M
August 10, 2009 at 1:17 am
Obviously, if we can’t have a fully-funded national health service or public health insurance, then we’ll have to try the conservatives’ approach (which noone hears of these days): mandatory health savings accounts and catastrophic insurance for those who can fully afford it, vouchers and medicaid for the poor and nearly poor, and a combination of HSAs and CI / vouchers and medicaid for the majority inbetween. Of course, that will never fly if the libs take the cons on their offer cause the cons don’t want any of THEIR beautiful money to go toward the health care of “shiftless” “******s”.

CK
August 11, 2009 at 12:57 pm
I am still not seeing anyone with plans to increase the supply of doctors and assorted other witch doctor’s assistants. So, more demand for sick people -> more sick people
->higher price for treating sick people -> higher cost for sickpeopletreatement insurance. Supply of health care providers is a governmentally mandated and enforced monopoly.


Leave a Reply
Click here to cancel reply. Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website






Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Don update your email address
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

I "over posted" still i cant edit it so....apologies
Don update your email address
lbj
Part Timer
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:38 am

Post by lbj »

don,

i don't know about americans going to the uk for health care but i am very familiar with arizonans going to mexico for health and dental care as well as medications. americans along the mexican border use mexican health care on a routine basis. there are chartered buses going daily from phoenix to nogales mx full of patients with and without medical insurance who cannot afford what is available in the us.

the other group that the right wing is not talking about is the under insured. those are the ones that have insurance but the coverage is so minimal that if anything serious happens to them, their insurance company will not cover the required treatment.

another fact that the right wingers are ignoring is that insurance companies and hmos have to approve your treatment before a doctor or hospital will commence the treatment so in essence you are at the mercy of insurance apparatchiks for your treatment and their ONLY concern is the company's bottom line.

however bad the uk system is, it is still better for the average person than the american fiasco.

over approximately 70% of the bankruptcies in the us are are a result of overwhelming medical bills. its something as an american that i am ashamed of and eager to see change.
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Don,
Your post is to long to address in total. I will give you my ideas and thoughts on the first part.

You said:
Of course im not as informed about the american system as i maybe should be.Im observing from a distance plainly....However ive read of people having to give up their homes to pay medical bills,people being cut off from cover because they reached their benefit limit,or being refused cover because of their long term medical needs....are these stories true or false? if true,then plainly there is a problem,if lies then someone should pursue those lies and show everyone that that is the case.I am not talking about the odd report ,there seems to be an awful lot of people who say (or have said) the same thing.


Those issues have happened to Americans. That is true. I've said repeatedly that our system does need to be fixed. But the occurrance of these types of issues are not wide spread. There is an even greater problem and it involves the underinsured amd those that work that cannot obtain insurance for various reasons. These issues are somewhat tied together.
Its also said that the private insurers employ a whole army of accountants to find ways to escape their insurance obligations.If that is just to uncover fraudelent claims etc..all well and good,but logic might hint thart its more to do with saving money by any means possible......And of course if there isnt an issue,then why are so many people determined to fix it?


Not quite true. Your bias against capitalism is showing. They are a business. They do employ accountants to ensure they make a profit. As for the fix it question. No it is not perfect. If it was I wouldn't have to worry about socialists undermining a system that simply needs to be updated. I too want the system "fixed" just not dismantled and rebuilt .
As for your statement that "people with means dont come to Britain for treatment" ..of course they wouldnt-theres no need ..if they have "means"....but of course for the wealthy theres no problem .
I think that the majority in britain value the national health service...there have been howls of protest,demonstrations and the like when part privatisation of the NHS plans have been put forward ........except from the wealthier part of the population,which is understandable, I guess.
But what of the Brits of "means" who come here for treatment? The common Canadians who come here for treatment? The rich from around the world? Why do they come to the last non-socialist (healthcare) Country in the world? Quite frankly, the common Brit values the NHS because they simply don't have a clue as to what timely healthcare is about. If a common Brit could afford to pay 5K to be treated for a life threatening disease in a timely manner, would they? The MAJORITY of Americans do not even think about it. Not even the poor here. You keep your list, I;ll keep my service. By the way, if my life is on the line due to illness, my possessions are the last thing I will worry about. At some point two places ahead in the line will be worth everything I own, if it could save my life.

You Brits went socialist with healthcare in 1942. You socialized everything to fight a war of survival. Now you have to ask for heatlthcare. I'm still a free man and can buy what I want when I want and how much I want. I have a choice you don't....unless some agency or bearocrat allows you. You obviuosly think that is fine.It's not something the MAJORITY of Americans want here.

By the way don't buy into what is being said on the major news networks here. They no longer represent the American populace.
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Time to address LBJ. Here goes.
i don't know about americans going to the uk for health care but i am very familiar with arizonans going to mexico for health and dental care as well as medications. americans along the mexican border use mexican health care on a routine basis. there are chartered buses going daily from phoenix to nogales mx full of patients with and without medical insurance who cannot afford what is available in the us.
LBJ is right. Folks here go to Mexico for dental care and scripts. Not so much for medical treatment but some do. But he fails to explain why. Is there some socialist medical nirvana right accross the border? Of course not!

Mexico is a third world country nothing more. If you buy a pack of cigarettes in Mexico it's half the price. Everything is cheaper due to the differences in costs and regulation. As for dental work and scripts. Many of the Dentists were trained in America and open high tech dental facilities right accross the border. They pay nothing for insurance and little for the infastructure compared to the US. They do not worry about malpractice. They are pure capitalists not socialists. They have a distinct advantage in the border towns.
the other group that the right wing is not talking about is the under insured. those are the ones that have insurance but the coverage is so minimal that if anything serious happens to them, their insurance company will not cover the required treatment.
LBJ is correct in this with the exception of the "right wing" statement. Rational Americans are talking about this needing to be fixed. Asshats want to change the whole damn system for political ends.
another fact that the right wingers are ignoring is that insurance companies and hmos have to approve your treatment before a doctor or hospital will commence the treatment so in essence you are at the mercy of insurance apparatchiks for your treatment and their ONLY concern is the company's bottom line.
This is simply a mindless statement. This is the (lack of) thought process that is down right scary for us rational folks. Somehow in LBJ's mind a government employee would do a better job. In fact, exchange the words "insurance" and "beurocrat" and see how it sounds. I've had HMO coverage and direct insurance coverage and saw none of this.
however bad the uk system is, it is still better for the average person than the american fiasco.


This is total bullshit pure and simple. A statement by someone that has not even researched at all on his own.
over approximately 70% of the bankruptcies in the us are are a result of overwhelming medical bills. its something as an american that i am ashamed of and eager to see change.
Another totally bullshit statement. Come on, you don't even have to think too hard to call bullshit on this one. Who the hell fed you this line of crap to pass out? I guess there are folks out there that will buy it hook line and sinker.
dondi
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca

Health Care

Post by dondi »

Good Day Gentlemen –
I am the new kid on the block and I am not too familiar with what you speak of. With several exceptions. I am married to a woman that lived in London for 25 years, and she praised the health care she received in England during those 25 years. She is now much older - as am I. Because of our ages we both decided to use Medicare and a Medicare Supplement that in a period of approximately 10 years we have had no trouble with the doctors, bills being paid etc. We have run into no hesitation whatsoever when the doc orders MRI’s, CAT scans, etc. However, interestingly enough our major doctor several years ago dropped all HMO patients. Saying that he could not afford to have his nurses spend hours on the phone trying to get permission for a patient to have an x-ray etc. Now that he is out of the HMO business he is doing quite well and has more time to spend with the patients.
However, what scares me re health care is the rumors I guess you could call them re death panels and the like, and even worse is Sarah Palin with her extremely limited knowledge in general, challenges Obama’s health care plan. Unfortunately I am afflicted with many, many physical problems, so at this point I could care less what the future health plans turn out to be. So perhaps you could enlighten me a bit more, as a lawyer would say in 10 words or less.
Thanks so much. I do read your posts every day and always find some truth to what you all say. The one thing I don’t understand is that some of you seem to ‘hide’ your location in the U.S. Why is that? In my working career I have found enormous cultural differences right here in the U.S. I live in Los Angeles, and to me it’s the greatest in the West. Thanks for hearing me out. Notice I did not feel the need to use less than appropriate language.
Oh yes, I meant to mention one very important thing. What does Obama plan to do about the uninsured. The people that can not afford medical insurance etc.?
Thanks again, and hopefully I will learn more about the LDM as I consider it a very fascinating subject.
Once He Lived
JIM HAMRICK
Part Timer
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:46 am
Location: phoenix
Contact:

a nation divided

Post by JIM HAMRICK »

Krun:

Thank you for answering some of the post as you have a better command of the written word than I.

I would like to add that those who go to Canada or Mexico are capitalist in the rawest form. Capatilism is not just selling but also buying at the lowest price.

Doni:

As to the knowledge of Sarah Palin, you will have to admit that because of her criticism of the health plan the Senate removed language that some "might interpert" as forming a death squad from their bill. Since President Obama has said this provision was not there (cain't take out something that was not there). She seems to be better imformed than most of congress and cerainly more informed than many of the newsmen on the T.V.. What we need now is for her to attack the bills currently in the House as what I have been told are much more Orwellian than what was in the Senate bill.

I though that the health care bill was to solve the plight of the uninsured/underinsured not scrap the whole system. Lets solve that problem and after the laws are in place see how they work.

jim hamrick
lbj
Part Timer
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:38 am

Post by lbj »

the so called death panel is noting but a republican lie. its one and only purpose was to give patients a chance to discuss their end of life options with their doctor instead of discussing them only with their lawyer by compensating doctors for what president ghw bush ordered them to do. republicans, have you no shame?
The furious controversy over Medicare payments for end-of-life care counseling stems from Section 1233 in the health bill passed by three House committees.

That language would amend the Social Security Act, which also governs Medicare, the federal program for the elderly and disabled. In 1990, when George H. W. Bush was president, new language was inserted in the Act (Title 18, Section 1866) which defined an "advance directive" to be "a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law… and relating to the provision of such care when the individual is incapacitated."

The 1990 language required that health care providers and organizations "maintain written policies and procedures with respect to all adult individuals receiving medical care by or through the provider or organization." That included things like documenting an advance directive "in a prominent part of the individual's current medical record" and providing “education for staff and the community on issues concerning advance directives."
whole article at:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32418644/ns ... alth_care/
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Thank you for answering some of the post as you have a better command of the written word than I.
Jim, I've read your posts for years. You do much better than me but thanks.

Dondi,
First off welcome to a rather strange corner of a great website. Why you would choose to wade into this swamp I can only guess. But welcome none the less.

You said:
However, interestingly enough our major doctor several years ago dropped all HMO patients. Saying that he could not afford to have his nurses spend hours on the phone trying to get permission for a patient to have an x-ray etc. Now that he is out of the HMO business he is doing quite well and has more time to spend with the patients.
i'm gald your Medicare is doing you right. It is one of our versions of a socialist system which caters to specific groups of Americans. Although socialist in concept they are guided and directed by the overwhelming capitalist system. So you get what you want, when you need it. As for your doctor dropping HMO's...that is purely capitalist and an excellent example of supply and demand. Next time you go in for care ask him how the HMO's are doing today. You may be surprised at what transpired over the past few years.
However, what scares me re health care is the rumors I guess you could call them re death panels and the like, and even worse is Sarah Palin with her extremely limited knowledge in general, challenges Obama’s health care plan.


Jim answered this quite clearly but I would like to add a little. Sarah chose her words carefully for full effect. "Death Squad" sends shivers down anyone's spine. She chose to take the verbage in the bill to the extreme. But it was a possibility. Required "end of life" counseling is just as disturbing to me. That was in the bill. So she pushed it to the limit and guess what...it was removed. For someone with "limited knowledge" she was able to eliminate a section of a bill with simply two words (death squads) on a facebook page. Could it be that she is more knowledgeable than the media portrays? Guess we'll find out in the future.
So perhaps you could enlighten me a bit more, as a lawyer would say in 10 words or less.
With such a complex issue that is one tall order. But I came up with these.

Don’t change what’s not broken, but fix what is.

Socialism has no place in the United States of America.

Don’t tread on me. I take this serious and will respond.

I’ll take care of mine. You just do the same.

I'll help anyone if you help yourself. (That was seven...wow!)
I live in Los Angeles, and to me it’s the greatest in the West.
You haven't been to Arizona then...and don't go to Texas!
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

Hi,
Just like to say,as it seems the general attitude amongst some quarters is to pour scorn on...and treat with contempt the British national health service.
It says a lot in Britain that whatever govt gets in here,no matter how right wing it is,it would never even contemplate for one second trying to dismantle the NHS....any govt that tried that would be out on their earholes in short time.To me,and to millions of others in britain,it really is something to be proud of..here if u need it you will get treatment (free) from anything from a ingrowing toe nail to a heart transplant.....no no worries of premiums rising because of the on going need for treatment,or having house taken away from you to pay,and such like. Its been a life saver for many millions of people ,both british and foreign......The waiting lists are due to the demand,which in turn is testament to the excellent service it provides .....suggest turning the british people over to the hands of private insurance health sharks,and i dare say there would be riots in the streets .
Of course there is a choice ,even in britain one CAN go private..if one can afford it,or wants to jump the queue........there doesnt seem any great rush by the public to fill up the private health clinics hospitals etc.The wealthy might,if its urgent,or convenient .

Ive read recently a few surveys,the conclusions being that Americans(or certain sectors of americans) would rather pay nmore overall for health insurance,than less in tax and have an NHS style system where other people might benefit from their money.That says a lot,if true,about the selfishness of people really.
In my opinion there is a space for capitalism and corporate greed and everything that goes with it...its perhaps essential to make an economy grow....but peoples health should not be part of the market economy ,it shouldnt be a business-it should be a service....ok a public service,i truly see nothing to complain about in that.How long before "businessmen" decide certain conditions arent economical to treat-at all....maybe 5 appendix ops are more lucrative than 1 heart transplant etc etc etc....cos everyone knows its not about your health,its about profit silly! :D
Don update your email address
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

I wonder if i can fit this in ......statistics from who 2009
Infant mortality rate
U.S 6.7 per 1,000 live births
U.K 4.8 per """""""""""

life expectancy
U.S 78
U.K 80
acute care hosp beds per 1000 people
U.S 2.7
U.K 2.6
practising physicians per 1000 people
U.S 2.4
U.K 2.5
HEAlth spending per head
U.S 7290
UK 2992

HEAlth spending as proprtion of of GDP
U.S 16%
U.K 8.4%

Id say that put in american terms "you get more bang for your bucks " with the NHS.

Having said that the WHO also say that New Zealands health system overall is EVEN worse than the U.S.A s......and OMANs is better than the british system......oh well...
Don update your email address
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Don,

You realise this is opposite to your views on previuos posts?

I understand the patriotic aspect to this but you are not helping yours.....you have simply conformed to the socialist montra.

Should I quote some of your previous posts?
lbj
Part Timer
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:38 am

Post by lbj »

knun,
I understand the patriotic aspect to this but you are not helping yours.....you have simply conformed to the socialist montra.
there you go again. when you cant defend your position with facts you attack the other persons personality. typical right wing nut mantra. cut the bull and lets hear some facts from you.
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

LBJ,
Do you really wan't me to posts the threads in which Don stated the exact opposite of what he just posted?

Sorry but I won't do that to him.
lbj
Part Timer
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 11:38 am

Post by lbj »

knun,

i have no interest in seeing you repost dons previous posts. they have nothing to do with the stats he posted. why dont you address the stats don presented? are they a too inconvenient truth for you???
javascript:emoticon(':P')
dons stats:
I wonder if i can fit this in ......statistics from who 2009
Infant mortality rate
U.S 6.7 per 1,000 live births
U.K 4.8 per """""""""""

life expectancy
U.S 78
U.K 80
acute care hosp beds per 1000 people
U.S 2.7
U.K 2.6
practising physicians per 1000 people
U.S 2.4
U.K 2.5
HEAlth spending per head
U.S 7290
UK 2992

HEAlth spending as proprtion of of GDP
U.S 16%
U.K 8.4%
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

Actually Don's previous posts have alot to do with this topic and even these stats.

But OK, as usual I'll play.

Let's look at a chart from WHO...shall we? Yes we shall!

Image

So when we look at this in chart it's obvious that although Europe has had socialized medicine for over fifty years our capitalist system is just as good. So changing the system for our children serves what purpose? Where is the spike for all those poor American children without care? You would think we would be much lower after hearing all the harping from the ASSHATS. This is a perfect example of the bullshit that is being passed around!

The MAJORITY of Americans are happy with what they have. Rich or poor, they are happy. This chart tells everyone why!
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

By the way the cost data from WHO is totally skewed. No true comparison at all if you look at the underlying presumptions.

Did I mention that the MAJORITY of Americans are happy regardless of what your views are?
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

Knun,
Im not conforming to any socialist mantra,and its not about patriotism either,i...ive no time for mad dog patriotism, my country isnt always right in everything it does,just because its my country,im quite prepared to give credit where credit is due,even to some aspects of socialism. Its about a health care system that works for the benefit of EVERYONE in Britain,resident or just visiting.Is it perfect? it certainly isnt,but then what is?
Beklieving in the NHS doesnt make one a socialist or a communist.The NHS has continued through both labour (socialist) and conservative govts since its conception,and served its people well.That fact isnt really up for question,85-90 million people in this country would tell you exactly the same. Do i contradict myself on occasion? probabley,even Renes Descartes who taught that reason and logic reigned supreme was guilty of that on many occasions,not that im comparing myself to him 8O .
This is more about american politics and money,and less to do with americans health. I appreciate what America has done/does,but not at all happy with the direction and integrityof their politicians and associations with big business,(health insurancers are but one of that number)To be frank none can be trusted.
As a question regarding the "marvelous" american health care system vs the ""communist inspired" NHS.....do we ever see Britons, canadians,europeans, mexicans, cubans,marching through the streets in ther respective countries demanding that their govts switch over to the American type health care system as a model to be admired and aspired to?...no we dont, on the contrary we have demonstrations protesting about the invasion of private health care and the practise of fast tracking for wealthy patients .Youve said the majority of Americans are overjoyed and very satisfied with the american health system..in light of that it is really amazing how Obama got elected,as one of his major promises was to to reform that very system.Maybe they didnt listen closely enough to what was said?..........
Don update your email address
don
Part Timer
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: united kingdom

Post by don »

Introduction

By several measures, health care spending continues to rise at a rapid rate and forcing businesses and families to cut back on operations and household expenses respectively.

In 2008, total national health expenditures were expected to rise 6.9 percent -- two times the rate of inflation.1 Total spending was $2.4 TRILLION in 2007, or $7900 per person1. Total health care spending represented 17 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).

U.S. health care spending is expected to increase at similar levels for the next decade reaching $4.3 TRILLION in 2017, or 20 percent of GDP.1

In 2008, employer health insurance premiums increased by 5.0 percent – two times the rate of inflation. The annual premium for an employer health plan covering a family of four averaged nearly $12,700. The annual premium for single coverage averaged over $4,700.2

National Health Care Spending

In 2008, health care spending in the United States reached $2.4 trillion, and was projected to reach $3.1 trillion in 2012.1 Health care spending is projected to reach $4.3 trillion by 2016.1
Health care spending is 4.3 times the amount spent on national defense.3
In 2008, the United States will spend 17 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care. It is projected that the percentage will reach 20 percent by 2017.1
Although nearly 46 million Americans are uninsured, the United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations, and those countries provide health insurance to all their citizens.3
Health care spending accounted for 10.9 percent of the GDP in Switzerland, 10.7 percent in Germany, 9.7 percent in Canada and 9.5 percent in France, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.4

Employer and Employee Health Insurance Costs


The annual premium that a health insurer charges an employer for a health plan covering a family of four averaged $12,700 in 2008. Workers contributed nearly $3,400, or 12 percent more than they did in 2007.2 The annual premiums for family coverage significantly eclipsed the gross earnings for a full-time, minimum-wage worker ($10,712).
Workers are now paying $1,600 more in premiums annually for family coverage than they did in 1999.2

Health insurance expenses are the fastest growing cost component for employers. Unless something changes dramatically, health insurance costs will overtake profits by the end of 2008.5
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust, premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance in the United States have been rising four times faster on average than workers’ earnings since 1999.2
The average employee contribution to company-provided health insurance has increased more than 120 percent since 2000. Average out-of-pocket costs for deductibles, co-payments for medications, and co-insurance for physician and hospital visits rose 115 percent during the same period.6
The percentage of Americans under age 65 whose family-level, out-of-pocket spending for health care, including health insurance, that exceeds $2,000 a year, rose from 37.3 percent in 1996 to 43.1 percent in 2003 – a 16 percent increase.7

The Impact of Rising Health Care Costs

National surveys show that the primary reason people are uninsured is the high cost of health insurance coverage.2

A recent study by Harvard University researchers found that the average out-of-pocket medical debt for those who filed for bankruptcy was $12,000. The study noted that 68 percent of those who filed for bankruptcy had health insurance. In addition, the study found that 50 percent of all bankruptcy filings were partly the result of medical expenses.9 Every 30 seconds in the United States someone files for bankruptcy in the aftermath of a serious health problem.
A new survey shows that more than 25 percent said that housing problems resulted from medical debt, including the inability to make rent or mortgage payments and the development of bad credit ratings.10
About 1.5 million families lose their homes to foreclosure every year due to unaffordable medical costs. 11
A survey of Iowa consumers found that in order to cope with rising health insurance costs, 86 percent said they had cut back on how much they could save, and 44 percent said that they have cut back on food and heating expenses.12
Retiring elderly couples will need $250,000 in savings just to pay for the most basic medical coverage.13 Many experts believe that this figure is conservative and that $300,000 may be a more realistic number.
According to a recent report, the United States has $480 billion in excess spending each year in comparison to Western European nations that have universal health insurance coverage. The costs are mainly associated with excess administrative costs and poorer quality of care.14
The United States spends six times more per capita on the administration of the health care system than its peer Western European nations.14
Don update your email address
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

Post by Knun »

"Im not conforming to any socialist mantra,and its not about patriotism either,i...ive no time for mad dog patriotism, my country isnt always right in everything it does,just because its my country,im quite prepared to give credit where credit is due,even to some aspects of socialism. Its about a health care system that works for the benefit of EVERYONE in Britain,resident or just visiting."
Then why did you post this?
We,over here, are taxed to the limits......few examples...petrol approx £5 a gallon ,of which approx £3.50 is tax, road tax licence £180 pound a year...and rising.Council taxes which average around £2000 a year for every household...licences to work are a relatively new taxation scheme,costing the worker around £300 for 3 years for example for a security guard,barman and associated employment.....some trades pay as much as £3000 ..gas installer for example....this is for everyone,british nationals and immigrants alike.
It would take all day to list the taxes imposed on british citizens,both direct taxes and indirect taxes....every day almost, a new scheme is suggested for squeezing the taxpayer even more.....and what exactly do we get in return? medical care ,cancer drugs etc are rationed,welfare payments seem to benefit the long term layabouts, we have a police force that are less interested in arresting criminals and more interested in capturing litterbugs and people who scratch their arse while driving.
I just hope you lot dont have to endure the same thing....and in truth i dont know that you will...but obamas words and attitude sound pretty ominous to me.....we have been listening to the same brand of nonsense here ever since tony blair took office. Its a nightmare-believe me
Has something changed since then?
Beklieving in the NHS doesnt make one a socialist or a communist.The NHS has continued through both labour (socialist) and conservative govts since its conception,and served its people well.That fact isnt really up for question,85-90 million people in this country would tell you exactly the same.
If everyone is so happy then why did yoy say:
Health care......10% of wage is the cost of national insurance stamp....it funds the national health and pension schemes......trouble is where once the national health system functioned pretty well,it is now in a state of disrepair.....treatment,life saving drugs etc are rationed...it largely deopends on which district you live in..in short its a lottery for british natives.
It didn't sound like you were happy with the socialist sysytem then. That was a few short months ago.
Youve said the majority of Americans are overjoyed and very satisfied with the american health system..in light of that it is really amazing how Obama got elected,as one of his major promises was to to reform that very system.Maybe they didnt listen closely enough to what was said?..........
Don, He wasn't elected purely on his healthcare ideas. The discussion of why and how we elected an ASSHAT is a moot point. Reform of our healthcare system is needed, just as Obama says, but the devil is in the details. We here in the States will not accept socialist agenda's masked behind reform. We will not easily accept large exspenditures of taxes that are unsustainable. Not to say we haven't but couple that with the socialist tripe and it doesn't fly.

Don, There is a big difference between our countries. It is important. We both believe in Liberty. But our definitions differ. While you believe all are equal most here believe something fundimentally different. We believe all are created equal. It's what you do with that god given right that defines you here. It's your choices, opportunity, and pure luck that defines you as a person. In Europe a person can be a leech on society all his life and is still considered equal. Here as a person yes he is. But as a member of society he has squandered his gift and must live his life accordingly.

Here he needs to "get a job!" in Europe he needs assistance. The difference between a socialist slant and a republic for the people by the people. For those that truly need help we are more than willing to help. But for those that choose to pack it in.....your on your own.

That's why the socialist montra rings hollow here. You alone are responsible for yourself here. I have no obligation to give you anything. In return you can live your life as you choose good or bad.
Knun
Part Timer
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 3:57 pm

The people spoke

Post by Knun »

Image

The people spoke and he listened. So let's see what this all means in the days and weeks to come.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_overhaul
Post Reply